Tuesday, March 17, 2020

Essay on National Government’s Education Policies and Federalism

Essay on National Government’s Education Policies and Federalism Essay on National Government’s Education Policies and Federalism Essay on National Government’s Education Policies and FederalismThe increasing role of the national government in the regulation and development of educational policies has a dubious effect. On the one hand, the federal government’s education policies contribute to the better funding of education institutions and programs but, on the other hand, the problem of the effective use of federal funds arises because the federal government cannot be as efficient as local authorities and public to determine which educational needs to fund at the moment. Hence, the increase role of the federal government in education policies opens new educational opportunities but, on the other hand, it raises the problem of the effective use of federal funds and respect to federalist principles of the US democracy and state.In fact, the federal government’s education policies are effective as long as new educational programs are created and supported by the federal government. The federa l government contributes to the broader coverage of public education and federal support of public schools (Levin-Waldman, 2012). However, the use of funds provided by the federal government is less effective compared to the state and local level because the federal government cannot always understand and meet needs of specific public schools. In this regard, even limited financial resources supplied by local and state governments could be used more effectively to meet specific needs of each public school.Thus, the increased role of the federal government in education policies challenges conventional federalist norms and principles. The federal government attempts to take initiative and lead in funding and, therefore, development of education policies. However, such policies are less effective than traditional federalist policies with the wider involvement of the local authorities because the federal government cannot manage public education as effectively as local and state authori ties.